-
Huffman Wilcox postete ein Update vor 12 Monaten
A total of 19 studies are included in the systematic review and 18 in the meta-analysis. Majority of the studies were deemed to have high risk of bias. Most of the interventions used a web-application for delivering their education (
= 17). While the interventions varied regarding duration and content, they were mainly guided by a symptom management theory. Web and mobile-based interventions significantly improved the overall physical symptom burden (SMD = -0.18; 95% CI = -0.28 to -0.09;
= 0%;
= 0.0002).
Web and mobile-based intervention are efficacious in decreasing the overall physical symptom burden in people with advanced cancer.
Web and mobile-based intervention are efficacious in decreasing the overall physical symptom burden in people with advanced cancer.
Despite the widespread use of conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), recurrence of cephalic arch stenosis (CAS), and low patency rate after PTA remain challenging problem. We aimed to identify the clinical predictors of recurrence of CAS and evaluate the effect of the access flow reduction on the fistula patency rate in patients with recurrent CAS.
In 1118 angiographies of 220 patients with CAS, access circuit patency rates after PTA and potential clinical predictors of recurrence of CAS were assessed. The effect of the banding procedure was evaluated in terms of post-interventional primary patency rate, and the number of interventions per access-year.
At 3, 6, and 12 months after the first PTA on CAS, the post-interventional access circuit primary patency rates were 68.8%, 40.5%, and 25.1%, respectively. High CV to CA ratio (the ratio of the maximal diameter of the distal cephalic vein to the diameter of the cephalic arch) (Hazard ratio (HR), 1.437; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03CV to CA ratio and high access flow.The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm is widely used to study false memory in the laboratory. It tests memory for lists of semantically related words (correct list item memories) and their non-presented associates (false lure memories). Evidence suggests that early items in DRM lists could make an especially significant contribution to false memories of lures, as they may critically influence the underlying associative activation and/or gist extraction processes. The present study tested this suggestion by using two manipulations that were intended to affect processing of early DRM list items. The first was interpolation of a semantically unrelated distractor item among the list items (Experiments 1 and 2). The second was arranging for these items to be either the strongest or weakest associates of the lure (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, a distractor item reduced both list item and lure recall when presented early in a DRM list, but selectively disrupted list item recall when presented late in the list. In Experiment 2, arranging for the early list items to be the weakest associates of the lure reduced false recall of the lure but had no effect on list item recall. The findings are discussed with respect to theories that explain false memory in the DRM protocol, including fuzzy trace theory (FTT) and activation-monitoring theory (AMT). They are also discussed with respect to general theories of memory and the potential role of category/context information in generating false memories.
Clinicians in the Emergency Center (EC) and Urgent Care (UC) can play a vital role in preventing hospital admissions and improving outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes or pre-existing diabetes who present with hyperglycemia and the need to initiate insulin.
This article describes a unique EC/UC discharge insulin starter kit protocol with clinician instructions via an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) order set that includes starting doses for insulin, a prescription for glucose monitoring supplies, and an emergent referral to diabetes education at International Diabetes Center. Patients receive insulin during the EC/UC visit and are provided an insulin pen to take home. Nurses from the EC or UC review and provide educational material on how to use an insulin pen, treating hypoglycemia and healthy eating. The Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist (CDCES) sees patients within 24-72 hours after the referral is placed.
Within our single healthcare system’s EC and UC (multiple sites), the kit has enabled clinicians to metabolically stabilize patients and decrease the need for hospitalization without experiencing hypoglycemia. In the recent three years of use, of 42 patients given the insulin starter kit, there were only 2 patients with repeat EC/UC visits within the first six months (1 hyperglycemia and 1 hypoglycemia).
An insulin starter kit and EMR-based order set initiated in the EC/UC setting is a tool that can be used to improve the quality of care for people with newly diagnosed or pre-existing diabetes experiencing significant hyperglycemia.
An insulin starter kit and EMR-based order set initiated in the EC/UC setting is a tool that can be used to improve the quality of care for people with newly diagnosed or pre-existing diabetes experiencing significant hyperglycemia.
Nearly all pediatric patients in our setting meet high-risk criteria for lead exposure based on screening recommendations and guidelines. click here Implementation of screening and testing has been inconsistent.
To assess the utility and efficacy of performing universal lead testing between ages 1 and 5 at an urban academic pediatric practice.
Retrospective review of patients with routine lead testing between 2010 and 2015. Key variables included demographics, serum lead level, and behavioral diagnoses.
A total of 6597 serum lead levels from 3274 patients were reviewed. Forty-seven samples (0.7%) from 24 patients (0.7%) were elevated. Of the 24 patients with elevated lead, 75% were identified at age 1 or 2. Sixty-seven percent of patients with first elevated lead level at age 3 or older had a diagnosis of developmental delay.
Routine testing of high-risk patients yielded minimal specificity in identifying elevated lead levels, especially in patients older than 3 years and without developmental delay.
Routine testing of high-risk patients yielded minimal specificity in identifying elevated lead levels, especially in patients older than 3 years and without developmental delay.